<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 346 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77112</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal without answering the substantial questions of law. The court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine whether the seized cash should be taxed in the hands of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of a thorough examination of all relevant materials in making such a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 346 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77112</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal without answering the substantial questions of law. The court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine whether the seized cash should be taxed in the hands of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of a thorough examination of all relevant materials in making such a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>