<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 287 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, and deemed the impugned order unsustainable. It held that bill collection services qualified as an &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal concluded that once Service tax was paid and credit taken based on invoices, the assessment could not be reopened, aligning with precedents from the Larger Bench and the Bombay HC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 287 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, and deemed the impugned order unsustainable. It held that bill collection services qualified as an &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal concluded that once Service tax was paid and credit taken based on invoices, the assessment could not be reopened, aligning with precedents from the Larger Bench and the Bombay HC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>