<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 281 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77049</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the Adjudicating Authority, Commissioner (Appeals), and the Appellate Tribunal. The Court found that the assessee was entitled to claim the Cenvat credit under the relevant notifications, and the revenue&#039;s arguments lacked merit. The Court concluded that the Adjudicating Authority rightly dropped the proceedings and refunded the amount, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 281 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77049</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the Adjudicating Authority, Commissioner (Appeals), and the Appellate Tribunal. The Court found that the assessee was entitled to claim the Cenvat credit under the relevant notifications, and the revenue&#039;s arguments lacked merit. The Court concluded that the Adjudicating Authority rightly dropped the proceedings and refunded the amount, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>