<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 278 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77046</link>
    <description>Wrongly availed Modvat/Cenvat credit on a paper transaction without actual receipt of inputs attracts the mandatory penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act when the statutory ingredients are established. The court applied the principle from Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills and held that, once wrongful availment on invoice-only transactions is proved, the Tribunal has no discretion to reduce the prescribed penalty. The assessee was therefore liable to the equal penalty mandated by the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 278 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77046</link>
      <description>Wrongly availed Modvat/Cenvat credit on a paper transaction without actual receipt of inputs attracts the mandatory penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act when the statutory ingredients are established. The court applied the principle from Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills and held that, once wrongful availment on invoice-only transactions is proved, the Tribunal has no discretion to reduce the prescribed penalty. The assessee was therefore liable to the equal penalty mandated by the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>