<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 67 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77044</link>
    <description>The court held that the order passed by the Chief Commissioner of Customs, acting as the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), is appealable under Section 129-A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal was overturned, directing the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits within three months. The writ petition was dismissed, and the legal questions were resolved in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 67 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77044</link>
      <description>The court held that the order passed by the Chief Commissioner of Customs, acting as the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), is appealable under Section 129-A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal was overturned, directing the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits within three months. The writ petition was dismissed, and the legal questions were resolved in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>