https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77034 The High Court dismissed six revenue appeals challenging a composite order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding deposits in a UCO Bank account. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision accepting the assessee's explanation for the deposits, related to the sale of Poplar trees and agricultural income. Finding no concealment of income, the Court affirmed the assessee's status as an agriculturist, with no intervention warranted. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan on April 6, 2010. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77034 The High Court dismissed six revenue appeals challenging a composite order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding deposits in a UCO Bank account. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision accepting the assessee's explanation for the deposits, related to the sale of Poplar trees and agricultural income. Finding no concealment of income, the Court affirmed the assessee's status as an agriculturist, with no intervention warranted. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan on April 6, 2010. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77034