<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 50 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77013</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Rulings held that Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act does not apply to a foreign company without a physical presence in India. Consequently, the capital gains from the sale of shares, exempt under Section 10(38), are not subject to Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT). The ruling, issued on July 23, 2010, clarified that withholding tax under Section 195 is not applicable in this scenario.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 50 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77013</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Rulings held that Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act does not apply to a foreign company without a physical presence in India. Consequently, the capital gains from the sale of shares, exempt under Section 10(38), are not subject to Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT). The ruling, issued on July 23, 2010, clarified that withholding tax under Section 195 is not applicable in this scenario.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>