<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 515 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the case concerning Service Tax liability on rent-a-cab services. The appellant&#039;s argument that they were not renting cabs but providing vehicles with drivers based on kilometers traveled was accepted. The Tribunal emphasized the definition of a &quot;rent-a-cab scheme operator&quot; and found in favor of the appellant due to lack of evidence supporting the Department&#039;s claim. The decision highlighted the distinction between Single Member Bench and Division Bench decisions, ultimately setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 515 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the case concerning Service Tax liability on rent-a-cab services. The appellant&#039;s argument that they were not renting cabs but providing vehicles with drivers based on kilometers traveled was accepted. The Tribunal emphasized the definition of a &quot;rent-a-cab scheme operator&quot; and found in favor of the appellant due to lack of evidence supporting the Department&#039;s claim. The decision highlighted the distinction between Single Member Bench and Division Bench decisions, ultimately setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>