<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 275 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76987</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the CIT&#039;s revisional order under s.263. The Tribunal had considered merits and the assessee&#039;s claim of eligibility for deduction under s.80-IB (including expanded SSI definition under s.80-IB(14)(g)) and found no legal infirmity. The HC held the Commissioner&#039;s exercise of revisional jurisdiction was unjustified: mere reappraisal or change of opinion is not permissible under s.263. The appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 275 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76987</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the CIT&#039;s revisional order under s.263. The Tribunal had considered merits and the assessee&#039;s claim of eligibility for deduction under s.80-IB (including expanded SSI definition under s.80-IB(14)(g)) and found no legal infirmity. The HC held the Commissioner&#039;s exercise of revisional jurisdiction was unjustified: mere reappraisal or change of opinion is not permissible under s.263. The appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>