<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 272 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76986</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the applications seeking condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. It held that specific provisions for condonation of delay in the Income-tax Act excluded the applicability of the Limitation Act. The court emphasized that in the absence of explicit provisions for condonation of delay, applications under the Limitation Act could not be entertained, similar to the interpretation applied in a previous Supreme Court case related to the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 272 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76986</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the applications seeking condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. It held that specific provisions for condonation of delay in the Income-tax Act excluded the applicability of the Limitation Act. The court emphasized that in the absence of explicit provisions for condonation of delay, applications under the Limitation Act could not be entertained, similar to the interpretation applied in a previous Supreme Court case related to the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>