<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 357 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76975</link>
    <description>HSN-based tariff classification under the Kerala VAT Act turns on the product&#039;s specific scheduled description and its dominant commercial use. Mosquito repellents were treated as insect repellents covered by the Third Schedule, so a contrary notification rate could not override that specific coverage. Lizol and Harpic were analysed as cleaning products whose disinfecting effect was incidental, placing them under the cleaning-agent entry. Dettol was treated as an antiseptic and hygiene product, not a medicament used for therapeutic or prophylactic treatment, so the residuary entry applied. The stated ratio is that the primary character of the product governs classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 357 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76975</link>
      <description>HSN-based tariff classification under the Kerala VAT Act turns on the product&#039;s specific scheduled description and its dominant commercial use. Mosquito repellents were treated as insect repellents covered by the Third Schedule, so a contrary notification rate could not override that specific coverage. Lizol and Harpic were analysed as cleaning products whose disinfecting effect was incidental, placing them under the cleaning-agent entry. Dettol was treated as an antiseptic and hygiene product, not a medicament used for therapeutic or prophylactic treatment, so the residuary entry applied. The stated ratio is that the primary character of the product governs classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>