https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76974 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to further opportunity for representation or hearing before the suspension of the Importer-Exporter Code (I.E.C.) under Section 11(4) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The court held that the clear and unambiguous language of the statute indicated that suspension of the I.E.C. was a consequence of non-payment of the penalty, making additional procedural safeguards unnecessary. en-us Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76974 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to further opportunity for representation or hearing before the suspension of the Importer-Exporter Code (I.E.C.) under Section 11(4) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The court held that the clear and unambiguous language of the statute indicated that suspension of the I.E.C. was a consequence of non-payment of the penalty, making additional procedural safeguards unnecessary. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76974