<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 622 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76967</link>
    <description>In waiver of pre-deposit under the foreign exchange enactments, the Tribunal must first assess whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case and then consider undue hardship, balance of convenience, financial capacity, and irreparable loss on the material placed before it. A detailed merits inquiry is unnecessary, but the pleadings and supporting documents must be meaningfully applied to the facts. Because the Tribunal relied on an incorrect assumption about a confessional statement and failed to evaluate the evidence of hardship and medical necessity, the 20% pre-deposit condition was held unsustainable and complete dispensation from deposit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 622 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76967</link>
      <description>In waiver of pre-deposit under the foreign exchange enactments, the Tribunal must first assess whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case and then consider undue hardship, balance of convenience, financial capacity, and irreparable loss on the material placed before it. A detailed merits inquiry is unnecessary, but the pleadings and supporting documents must be meaningfully applied to the facts. Because the Tribunal relied on an incorrect assumption about a confessional statement and failed to evaluate the evidence of hardship and medical necessity, the 20% pre-deposit condition was held unsustainable and complete dispensation from deposit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>