<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 265 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76958</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the appellate commissioner and the Tribunal, confirming that the tax liability under the Finance Act, 2005, for enhancing the acidic value of humic acid was unsustainable due to the lack of findings on suppression of facts by the assessee. The court found no basis to interfere with the impugned order, dismissing the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 265 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76958</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the appellate commissioner and the Tribunal, confirming that the tax liability under the Finance Act, 2005, for enhancing the acidic value of humic acid was unsustainable due to the lack of findings on suppression of facts by the assessee. The court found no basis to interfere with the impugned order, dismissing the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>