<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 40 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76948</link>
    <description>The court held that the block assessment order under Section 158BC(c) was invalid as the notice under Section 143(2) was issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 40 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76948</link>
      <description>The court held that the block assessment order under Section 158BC(c) was invalid as the notice under Section 143(2) was issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>