https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76926 The Supreme Court held that the decision on which form to use for filing income-tax returns lies with the statutory authority, not the court. The court set aside the High Court's order allowing the use of Form Saral 2D instead of prescribed forms ITR-1 to ITR-8, as the original filing deadline had passed. The Union of India extended the deadline for all assessees to February 29, 2008, for filing in the prescribed form. Assessees who had filed in Form Saral 2D based on the High Court's order were directed to refile in the prescribed form by the extended deadline. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76926 The Supreme Court held that the decision on which form to use for filing income-tax returns lies with the statutory authority, not the court. The court set aside the High Court's order allowing the use of Form Saral 2D instead of prescribed forms ITR-1 to ITR-8, as the original filing deadline had passed. The Union of India extended the deadline for all assessees to February 29, 2008, for filing in the prescribed form. Assessees who had filed in Form Saral 2D based on the High Court's order were directed to refile in the prescribed form by the extended deadline. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76926