<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 324 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for verification of the correct number of usable tyres, determination of duty liability, and consideration of penalty imposition for violating the foreign trade policy provisions. The penalty and fine imposed by the Commissioner were set aside, except for the 3,142 usable tyres restricted under the EXIM policy, where a nominal penalty and fine might be imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 324 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for verification of the correct number of usable tyres, determination of duty liability, and consideration of penalty imposition for violating the foreign trade policy provisions. The penalty and fine imposed by the Commissioner were set aside, except for the 3,142 usable tyres restricted under the EXIM policy, where a nominal penalty and fine might be imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>