<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 382 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76915</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that a public charitable trust running educational institutions was not entitled to exemption under section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act for capitation fees received as they were not considered voluntary contributions towards the trust&#039;s corpus. The court emphasized that the nature of the receipt at the time of receipt is vital in determining its tax treatment, distinguishing capitation fees from voluntary donations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 382 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76915</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that a public charitable trust running educational institutions was not entitled to exemption under section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act for capitation fees received as they were not considered voluntary contributions towards the trust&#039;s corpus. The court emphasized that the nature of the receipt at the time of receipt is vital in determining its tax treatment, distinguishing capitation fees from voluntary donations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>