<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76902</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment for the Assessment Year 2004-05. The Court found that the reasons for reopening lacked tangible material and that the Assessing Officer had acted beyond the scope of jurisdiction. The Court also clarified the interpretation of the provisions of Section 115JB in the context of the assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76902</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 for reopening the assessment for the Assessment Year 2004-05. The Court found that the reasons for reopening lacked tangible material and that the Assessing Officer had acted beyond the scope of jurisdiction. The Court also clarified the interpretation of the provisions of Section 115JB in the context of the assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>