<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 362 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76897</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claimed depreciation on the Tetrapack machine. The decision was based on the principle that keeping the machine ready for use constituted its use, entitling the assessee to depreciation even if it was not actively utilized during the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 362 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76897</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claimed depreciation on the Tetrapack machine. The decision was based on the principle that keeping the machine ready for use constituted its use, entitling the assessee to depreciation even if it was not actively utilized during the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>