<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 610 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, finding that the Cenvat credit of duty paid on dutiable goods was admissible under Rule 6(6)(v) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 610 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, finding that the Cenvat credit of duty paid on dutiable goods was admissible under Rule 6(6)(v) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>