<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76871</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition, holding the s.148 notice invalid because the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material to form a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment under s.147. The court found the reassessment amounted to an impermissible change of opinion concerning deductions for tank land liability and disallowance of depreciation on written-off obsolete assets. The original computation, accepting deductions of Rs. 3.16 crores, stood and the reasons for reopening did not substantively address the issues; accordingly the reopening was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76871</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition, holding the s.148 notice invalid because the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material to form a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment under s.147. The court found the reassessment amounted to an impermissible change of opinion concerning deductions for tank land liability and disallowance of depreciation on written-off obsolete assets. The original computation, accepting deductions of Rs. 3.16 crores, stood and the reasons for reopening did not substantively address the issues; accordingly the reopening was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>