<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 316 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76870</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner had fully disclosed all necessary material facts for the assessment year 2003-04, rendering the reopening of assessment invalid as the statutory condition for reopening beyond four years was not met. The petition was allowed, setting aside the notice and assessment order, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 316 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76870</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner had fully disclosed all necessary material facts for the assessment year 2003-04, rendering the reopening of assessment invalid as the statutory condition for reopening beyond four years was not met. The petition was allowed, setting aside the notice and assessment order, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>