<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 260 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76869</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found that the respondent maintained separate accounts and there was no evidence of imported raw material used in goods sold in the Domestic Tariff Area. The Court noted the lack of conclusive proof supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims and concluded that the duty liability under a specific notification was not applicable. The appeal was dismissed as both questions of law were decided in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 260 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76869</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found that the respondent maintained separate accounts and there was no evidence of imported raw material used in goods sold in the Domestic Tariff Area. The Court noted the lack of conclusive proof supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims and concluded that the duty liability under a specific notification was not applicable. The appeal was dismissed as both questions of law were decided in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>