<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 267 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76862</link>
    <description>The writ petition is allowed, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur. The Commissioner is directed to refer the matter, along with the CRCL report, to the DGFT. Subsequent actions under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and the Customs Act, 1962, are contingent upon the DGFT&#039;s determination of goods not meeting the classification for DEPB benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 267 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76862</link>
      <description>The writ petition is allowed, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur. The Commissioner is directed to refer the matter, along with the CRCL report, to the DGFT. Subsequent actions under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and the Customs Act, 1962, are contingent upon the DGFT&#039;s determination of goods not meeting the classification for DEPB benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>