<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 499 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76847</link>
    <description>A penalty on a Deputy Commissioner for issuing end-use certificates based on statutory records could not be sustained where there was no specific allegation of collusion or deliberate wrongdoing. The Tribunal noted that the officer acted in her official capacity and relied on the assessee&#039;s statutory records, and it was not enough to complain that other records were not independently verified. As the act was done in good faith on official records, statutory protection for such conduct applied, and penal or disciplinary consequence was unwarranted. The impugned penalty order was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 499 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76847</link>
      <description>A penalty on a Deputy Commissioner for issuing end-use certificates based on statutory records could not be sustained where there was no specific allegation of collusion or deliberate wrongdoing. The Tribunal noted that the officer acted in her official capacity and relied on the assessee&#039;s statutory records, and it was not enough to complain that other records were not independently verified. As the act was done in good faith on official records, statutory protection for such conduct applied, and penal or disciplinary consequence was unwarranted. The impugned penalty order was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>