<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 380 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76846</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, addressed multiple issues involving a dispute over vessel purchase assessment and refund claims. The Tribunal directed the authorities to implement its order, finalized assessment dropping the demand, and allowed the refund claim. However, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application to be not maintainable, emphasizing the need for the appellant to pursue the appropriate legal remedy by filing an appeal rather than seeking directions from the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 380 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76846</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, addressed multiple issues involving a dispute over vessel purchase assessment and refund claims. The Tribunal directed the authorities to implement its order, finalized assessment dropping the demand, and allowed the refund claim. However, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application to be not maintainable, emphasizing the need for the appellant to pursue the appropriate legal remedy by filing an appeal rather than seeking directions from the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>