<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 314 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76843</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside a penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The tribunal upheld the fine but determined that the appellant did not fall under the categories covered by Rule 25. The value of the confiscated goods exceeded Rs.12 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 314 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76843</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside a penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The tribunal upheld the fine but determined that the appellant did not fall under the categories covered by Rule 25. The value of the confiscated goods exceeded Rs.12 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>