<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 663 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76835</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 135(1)(i) of the Customs Act based on the evidence presented, confirming the petitioner&#039;s violation. The Court modified the fine to Rs.35,000/- and imposed a default three-month sentence due to mitigating circumstances. The petitioner was granted one month to pay the fine, with non-payment leading to a court appearance for sentencing as per the revised order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 663 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76835</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 135(1)(i) of the Customs Act based on the evidence presented, confirming the petitioner&#039;s violation. The Court modified the fine to Rs.35,000/- and imposed a default three-month sentence due to mitigating circumstances. The petitioner was granted one month to pay the fine, with non-payment leading to a court appearance for sentencing as per the revised order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>