<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 260 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76832</link>
    <description>The court declined to interfere in the customs case regarding cross-examination of witnesses during a search operation. It emphasized the department&#039;s discretion in producing witnesses and the potential adverse inferences if witnesses were not produced. The court maintained that it could not compel witness production, ultimately disposing of the writ petition and emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and fairness in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 260 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76832</link>
      <description>The court declined to interfere in the customs case regarding cross-examination of witnesses during a search operation. It emphasized the department&#039;s discretion in producing witnesses and the potential adverse inferences if witnesses were not produced. The court maintained that it could not compel witness production, ultimately disposing of the writ petition and emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and fairness in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>