<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 312 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76825</link>
    <description>An adjudicatory order must record the rival contentions and disclose the reasons for its conclusion, because judicial review requires the basis of decision to be apparent. Where a Tribunal order is unreasoned and does not deal with the parties&#039; submissions, it breaches fairness and principles of natural justice. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 312 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76825</link>
      <description>An adjudicatory order must record the rival contentions and disclose the reasons for its conclusion, because judicial review requires the basis of decision to be apparent. Where a Tribunal order is unreasoned and does not deal with the parties&#039; submissions, it breaches fairness and principles of natural justice. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law and natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>