https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76823 The court ruled that the challenge to the validity of the Customs Tariff Rules, 1995 (prayer clause (a)) would be entertained. However, the challenges to the final findings and customs notification imposing anti-dumping duty (prayer clauses (b) and (c)) were rejected. The petitioners were directed to pursue their alternative remedy under Section 9-C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, through the appellate authority. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory procedures and denied the prayer for interim relief. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76823 The court ruled that the challenge to the validity of the Customs Tariff Rules, 1995 (prayer clause (a)) would be entertained. However, the challenges to the final findings and customs notification imposing anti-dumping duty (prayer clauses (b) and (c)) were rejected. The petitioners were directed to pursue their alternative remedy under Section 9-C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, through the appellate authority. The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory procedures and denied the prayer for interim relief. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76823