<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 553 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellant failed to fulfill the export obligation, mis-declared the quantity of imported sea material, and was liable for duty on 10.932 MTs. The confiscation of goods and penalties imposed were deemed appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, and the original order was affirmed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 553 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellant failed to fulfill the export obligation, mis-declared the quantity of imported sea material, and was liable for duty on 10.932 MTs. The confiscation of goods and penalties imposed were deemed appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, and the original order was affirmed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>