<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 370 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld a penalty of Rs.5.00 lakhs on the Importing Firm for misdeclaration of goods under the Customs Act. Penalties on individual appellants were reduced to match the Importing Firm&#039;s penalty, considering their roles in the business. The CHA Firm was not penalized as there was no evidence of connivance with the importer to evade duty payment. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 370 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld a penalty of Rs.5.00 lakhs on the Importing Firm for misdeclaration of goods under the Customs Act. Penalties on individual appellants were reduced to match the Importing Firm&#039;s penalty, considering their roles in the business. The CHA Firm was not penalized as there was no evidence of connivance with the importer to evade duty payment. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>