<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 367 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76795</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not survive once the Tribunal, after remand, held that no duty was leviable on the respondent. The Court treated the absence of duty liability as removing the foundation for penalty and also noted that no substantial question of law arose. As a result, the penalty was unsustainable and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 367 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76795</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not survive once the Tribunal, after remand, held that no duty was leviable on the respondent. The Court treated the absence of duty liability as removing the foundation for penalty and also noted that no substantial question of law arose. As a result, the penalty was unsustainable and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>