<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 302 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76793</link>
    <description>High Speed Diesel used to generate electricity for captive factory consumption is not eligible for Modvat credit where a notification issued under Rule 57A expressly excludes it. Rule 57A permits specification, restriction and exclusion of eligible inputs, while Rule 57B includes fuel and electricity-generation inputs only when they are specified under Rule 57A. The non obstante clause in Rule 57B does not override an express exclusion in the Rule 57A notification. An earlier Supreme Court ruling was distinguishable because it did not address an exclusionary notification and concerned the pre-amendment rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 302 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76793</link>
      <description>High Speed Diesel used to generate electricity for captive factory consumption is not eligible for Modvat credit where a notification issued under Rule 57A expressly excludes it. Rule 57A permits specification, restriction and exclusion of eligible inputs, while Rule 57B includes fuel and electricity-generation inputs only when they are specified under Rule 57A. The non obstante clause in Rule 57B does not override an express exclusion in the Rule 57A notification. An earlier Supreme Court ruling was distinguishable because it did not address an exclusionary notification and concerned the pre-amendment rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>