https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76790 Petitioner challenged periodic show-cause notices alleging RDC formed part of assessable value under s.4(1)(b) read with Rule 5 for July 2000-April 2005; Commissioner (Appeals) upheld assessment. HC found the Tribunal's present contrary view inconsistent with an earlier appellate Bench decision, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo decision. HC directed that if a contra view is taken on remand, the question be referred to a Larger Bench. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76790 Petitioner challenged periodic show-cause notices alleging RDC formed part of assessable value under s.4(1)(b) read with Rule 5 for July 2000-April 2005; Commissioner (Appeals) upheld assessment. HC found the Tribunal's present contrary view inconsistent with an earlier appellate Bench decision, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo decision. HC directed that if a contra view is taken on remand, the question be referred to a Larger Bench. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76790