<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 242 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76789</link>
    <description>Modvat credit is unavailable where duty-paid inputs were not actually received and the supporting invoices were found to be invalid on admissions and documentary evidence. The Commissioner had relied on statements, transport records, octroi material and surrounding evidence to conclude that the goods never reached the assessee&#039;s premises, but the Tribunal reversed that finding without properly addressing the material on record. The appellate order was therefore set aside and the dispute remanded for fresh adjudication on entitlement to credit on the existing admissions and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 242 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76789</link>
      <description>Modvat credit is unavailable where duty-paid inputs were not actually received and the supporting invoices were found to be invalid on admissions and documentary evidence. The Commissioner had relied on statements, transport records, octroi material and surrounding evidence to conclude that the goods never reached the assessee&#039;s premises, but the Tribunal reversed that finding without properly addressing the material on record. The appellate order was therefore set aside and the dispute remanded for fresh adjudication on entitlement to credit on the existing admissions and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>