<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 299 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76784</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was decided by the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on most questions of law, except for the specific issue concerning roll over charges/expenditure paid to banks. The decision was based on legal interpretations, previous judgments, and factual findings. The Court did not award any costs in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 299 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76784</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was decided by the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on most questions of law, except for the specific issue concerning roll over charges/expenditure paid to banks. The decision was based on legal interpretations, previous judgments, and factual findings. The Court did not award any costs in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>