<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 208 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76765</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the appeal against the rate of tax breached the conditions of the first proviso, allowing for reconsideration of the penalty imposition. The case was remanded for further proceedings, emphasizing the discretionary power in imposing penalties and the importance of complying with statutory conditions to avoid penalties under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 208 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76765</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the appeal against the rate of tax breached the conditions of the first proviso, allowing for reconsideration of the penalty imposition. The case was remanded for further proceedings, emphasizing the discretionary power in imposing penalties and the importance of complying with statutory conditions to avoid penalties under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>