<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 277 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76749</link>
    <description>Private records recovered during a raid are not enough by themselves; clandestine production and removal must still be established by positive evidence. Even where some material suggests an attempt to evade detection, the evidentiary basis must be sufficient to prove the alleged clandestine manufacture and removal for the relevant period. On the facts discussed, the material was found inadequate to sustain the Revenue&#039;s case, and the issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 277 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76749</link>
      <description>Private records recovered during a raid are not enough by themselves; clandestine production and removal must still be established by positive evidence. Even where some material suggests an attempt to evade detection, the evidentiary basis must be sufficient to prove the alleged clandestine manufacture and removal for the relevant period. On the facts discussed, the material was found inadequate to sustain the Revenue&#039;s case, and the issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>