<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 184 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, upholding the appropriation of service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 77 but setting aside the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal clarified that if service tax is self-ascertained and paid before the issuance of a show cause notice, proceedings should be considered concluded, emphasizing the need for timely rectification to avoid penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 184 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, upholding the appropriation of service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 77 but setting aside the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal clarified that if service tax is self-ascertained and paid before the issuance of a show cause notice, proceedings should be considered concluded, emphasizing the need for timely rectification to avoid penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>