<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 181 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76728</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on house keeping and garden maintenance services was treated as admissible because the definition of input service was applied broadly to cover services used in activities relating to business. On that basis, the services were found to have sufficient nexus with business operations, so denial of credit was unsustainable. The penalty could not survive once the credit disallowance failed, and it was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 181 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76728</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on house keeping and garden maintenance services was treated as admissible because the definition of input service was applied broadly to cover services used in activities relating to business. On that basis, the services were found to have sufficient nexus with business operations, so denial of credit was unsustainable. The penalty could not survive once the credit disallowance failed, and it was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>