https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76717 The Court found that the petition filed by Ispat Industries Limited was an abuse of process due to the failure to disclose the earlier rejection of the rebate claim. The Court held that there was an unexplained delay in filing the application for rebate and emphasized the importance of full disclosure of material facts. As a result, the Court allowed the writ petition filed by the Union of India, setting aside the order granting the rebate and dismissing Ispat's petition. No costs were awarded in this matter. en-us Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76717 The Court found that the petition filed by Ispat Industries Limited was an abuse of process due to the failure to disclose the earlier rejection of the rebate claim. The Court held that there was an unexplained delay in filing the application for rebate and emphasized the importance of full disclosure of material facts. As a result, the Court allowed the writ petition filed by the Union of India, setting aside the order granting the rebate and dismissing Ispat's petition. No costs were awarded in this matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76717