https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76713 The appeal in the case concerning service tax demand and penalty imposition during 2002-2005 was allowed by the Vice-President. The demand and penalty were upheld due to the failure of the assessees to dispute their tax liability before the adjudicating authority. However, regarding the benefit of abatement of transportation charges, the Vice-President directed a reevaluation by the adjudicating authority based on the invoices provided by the assessees. The order disallowing the claim for abatement was set aside, and the case was remitted for further consideration. en-us Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2011 18:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76713 The appeal in the case concerning service tax demand and penalty imposition during 2002-2005 was allowed by the Vice-President. The demand and penalty were upheld due to the failure of the assessees to dispute their tax liability before the adjudicating authority. However, regarding the benefit of abatement of transportation charges, the Vice-President directed a reevaluation by the adjudicating authority based on the invoices provided by the assessees. The order disallowing the claim for abatement was set aside, and the case was remitted for further consideration. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76713