https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76706 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax from 2001 to 2007, along with penalties under Section 76 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, against the appellant providing security services. Despite the rejection of the appeal due to failure to deposit the required amount, the Tribunal remanded the case, reducing the pre-deposit amount to Rs.2 lakhs, allowing the appeal to proceed without further deposit, and disposing of the stay petition in the same decision. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76706 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax from 2001 to 2007, along with penalties under Section 76 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, against the appellant providing security services. Despite the rejection of the appeal due to failure to deposit the required amount, the Tribunal remanded the case, reducing the pre-deposit amount to Rs.2 lakhs, allowing the appeal to proceed without further deposit, and disposing of the stay petition in the same decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76706