<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 143 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76693</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the adjustment of excess and shortage amounts in calculating service tax liabilities for telephone services. It held that adjustments should be made at the end of the semi-annual filing period, rejecting the department&#039;s argument for separate refund claims for excess payments. The decision affirmed the lower authority&#039;s approach, dismissing the department&#039;s appeals and providing clarity on the computation and adjustment of service tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 143 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76693</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the adjustment of excess and shortage amounts in calculating service tax liabilities for telephone services. It held that adjustments should be made at the end of the semi-annual filing period, rejecting the department&#039;s argument for separate refund claims for excess payments. The decision affirmed the lower authority&#039;s approach, dismissing the department&#039;s appeals and providing clarity on the computation and adjustment of service tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>