<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 21 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76688</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars in the case of penalty assessment under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for investments written off. The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and emphasizing the disclosure of all material facts. No costs were awarded, and the appeal was deemed to lack merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 21 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76688</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars in the case of penalty assessment under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for investments written off. The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and emphasizing the disclosure of all material facts. No costs were awarded, and the appeal was deemed to lack merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>