<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 141 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76685</link>
    <description>The Vice-President upheld the tax liability on amounts collected for soil testing services but set aside taxation on amounts related to building construction, aligning with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision regarding tax liability on services provided by holders of service tax registration offering &#039;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service.&#039;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 141 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76685</link>
      <description>The Vice-President upheld the tax liability on amounts collected for soil testing services but set aside taxation on amounts related to building construction, aligning with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision regarding tax liability on services provided by holders of service tax registration offering &#039;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service.&#039;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>