<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 140 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76684</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for want of Committee on Disputes clearance, with liberty to seek restoration once such clearance is obtained. The order reflects that the appeal could not be entertained at that stage because the required clearance had not been produced, but it preserves the appellant&#039;s right to apply again after compliance with that procedural requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 140 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76684</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for want of Committee on Disputes clearance, with liberty to seek restoration once such clearance is obtained. The order reflects that the appeal could not be entertained at that stage because the required clearance had not been produced, but it preserves the appellant&#039;s right to apply again after compliance with that procedural requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>